Skip to main content

Many Patients Unaware of Radiation Risk From CT Scans


By Genevra Pittman
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Jan 03 - One-third of people getting a CT scan didn't know the test exposed their body to radiation, in a new study from a single U.S. medical center.
The majority of patients also underestimated the amount of radiation delivered by a CT scan, and just one in 20 believed the scan would increase their chance of ever getting cancer.
The study's lead researcher, Janet Busey, said doctors need to do a better job of talking to patients about the risks and benefits of the tests, including about radiation exposure.
One challenge is that there is still debate within the medical community about just how much long term cancer risk the scans carry, she said. That risk also depends on how many scans a patient gets and which organs are exposed to radiation.
"There's no doubt, CT saves lives," Busey, from the University of Washington in Seattle, told Reuters Health. And their benefits usually outweigh their risks, she added. Still, even if the radiation risk is small, patients "definitely should be aware of it."
In earlier studies, Busey and her colleagues learned anecdotally that many patients didn't know much about CT scans. So they surveyed 235 people who were having a non-emergency CT scan, or a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan.
Two-thirds of the patients believed their scan was definitely necessary and would benefit their health, and 84% said their doctors had explained the reason for the scan.
Two-thirds of the patients understood CT scans involve radiation, but less than half of those had learned about radiation risks from their doctor.
Few patients were worried about the scans or the link between radiation exposure and cancer. More people reported having thought about when they could eat or whether their parking would be validated after the test than about the effects of radiation, according to findings published online December 31 in JAMA Internal Medicine (formerly Archives of Internal Medicine).
"It's really a physician's job to explain to a patient what the risks and the benefits are... and sometimes we need to do a better job," said Dr. Angela Mills, an emergency medicine researcher who has studied radiation risks at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
The radiation dose from one CT scan typically ranges from a couple of mSv - comparable to the yearly background radiation from natural sources - to close to 20 mSv, the annual exposure limit for nuclear industry employees.
Although each scan only has a small impact on a person's long term risk of cancer, that risk can build over time with more scans and more radiation exposure.
"To me the problem is when patients have a problem that either is chronic or they keep having pain or maybe there are alternative ways to diagnose (their condition), and patients then need to be better informed what their options are," Dr. Mills, who wasn't involved in the new study, told Reuters Health.
For example, people who develop recurring kidney stones may be able to skip a scan altogether or get an ultrasound instead of having repeat CTs, she said.
One study from the National Cancer Institute estimated there would be about 29,000 future cancers related to scans done in 2007 alone. That year, Americans had about 72 million total CT scans.
Busey said it's important to educate all patients about the benefits and possible harms of their scans - but that it will be up to the larger medical community to figure out how to do that in a way that's both standardized across facilities and individualized to each patient's particular situation.
"It's a difficult concept to understand, and risk itself is difficult to talk about," especially because of the uncertainties involved, she said.
"This is the first step."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Contact Precautions May Have Unintended Consequences

Contact precautions, including gloves, gowns, and isolated rooms, have helped stem the transmission of hospital pathogens but have also had some negative consequences, according to findings from a new study. Healthcare worker (HCWs) visited patients on contact precautions less frequently than other patients and spent less time with those patients when they did visit, report Daniel J. Morgan, MD, from the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, and colleagues. Moreover, patients on contact precautions also received fewer outside visitors. "Less contact with HCWs suggests that other unintended consequences of contact precautions still exist," Dr. Morgan and coauthors write. "The resulting decrease in HCW contact may lead to increased adverse events and a lower quality of patient care due to less consistent patient monitoring and poorer adherence to standard adverse event prevention methods (such...
Post a Comment
Read more

Obama Renominates Tavenner to Be CMS Chief

President Barack Obama yesterday renominated Marilyn Tavenner, the acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to serve in that post without the caveat of "acting" attached to it. If the Senate approves her nomination, Tavenner will be the first confirmed, full-fledged CMS administrator since Mark McClellan, MD, PhD, stepped down from that position in October 2006, during the George W. Bush administration. Dr. McClellan's successors either were acting administrators or, in the case of Donald Berwick, MD, who was Tavenner's immediate predecessor, a recess appointment. As illustrated by Dr. Berwick's  CMS history , Senate confirmation can be tough to get when one party has enough votes to filibuster and otherwise stymie a nomination by an opposing party's president. That was the case when Obama nominated Dr. Berwick, whom Senate Republicans portrayed as an advocate of healthcare rationing, a characterization denied by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Secondary Prevention: Clinical Approaches to Managing the Higher-Risk Patient with Heart Disease

INCIDENCE/PREVALENCE/BURDENS ASSOCIATED WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CVD) The prevention of an initial and recurrent cardiovascular event and other complications, such as diabetes and kidney failure [also known as end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5] is an important goal in patients with a history of CVD. Each year, approximately 185,000 Americans suffer a recurrent stroke, approximately 470,000 will have a recurrent coronary attack, and an estimated 325,000 will suffer a recurrent myocardial infarction. [1]  Secondary prevention strategies offer the opportunity to prevent further complications and improve outcomes by early detection and management of common comorbidities. The burden on public health and the costs associated with chronic illnesses such as CVD, CKD, and diabetes remain high. An estimated 82.6 million American adults (1 in 3) have 1 or more types of CVD. [1]  Heart failure is the fastest-growing clinical cardiac disease ...
Post a Comment
Read more