Skip to main content

Mail-Order Pharmacy Reduces Racial Disparities in Adherence to BP Meds


OAKLAND, California — Making prescription refills more affordable and easier to obtain may improve adherence to antihypertensive medication, particularly among certain ethnic groups that currently lag behind in terms of compliance, new research shows [1].
"What is new here is that we really did focus on factors we consider to be modifiable through health-system intervention," lead author Dr Alyce S Adams (Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA) told heart wire . She and her colleagues report their findings in a paper published online December 10, 2012 in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
 
When we looked at race and added in these issues of copay and mail order pharmacy, we found the difference between blacks and whites in particular--but also between Hispanics and whites--narrowed.
 
"We found that health-system factors such as medication copay and the use of mail-order pharmacy were both associated with better adherence for all races and ethnicities," she explains. "And when we looked at race, controlling for clinical factors, and added in these issues of copay and mail-order pharmacy, we found the difference between blacks and whites in particular--but also between Hispanics and whites--narrowed. So it's equally beneficial across [racial] groups, and if we can get people to sign up for it we have a better shot at getting them to comply with their medication.
"What's encouraging is that we've seen so [many] saying these ethnic differences are persistent and we don't know what to do about them, and these are some very specific concrete things that we can look into," she observes.
Nonwhites More Likely to Be Nonpersistent and Nonadherent to Meds
Adams and colleagues used a hypertension registry at Kaiser Permanente Northern California to conduct a retrospective study of 44 167 adults with high blood pressure who were new users of antihypertensive therapy in 2008. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, they modeled the relationships between race/ethnicity, specific health-system factors, and early nonpersistence (failing to refill the first prescription within 90 days) and nonadherence (<80% days covered during the first 12 months following the start of treatment), respectively, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors.
 
We've seen so much saying these ethnic differences are persistent and we don't know what to do about them, and these are some very specific concrete things that we can look into.
 
"Everyone had insurance, so the first hurdle of access was taken care of," Adams notes.
More than 30% of patients were nonpersistent early, and one in five was nonadherent to therapy; nonwhites were more likely to exhibit both types of behavior compared with whites. After multivariate adjustment for sociodemographic, clinical, and health-system factors, blacks were 56% more likely than whites to demonstrate early nonpersistence, Asians 40% more likely, and Hispanics 46% more likely. Corresponding figures for nonadherence were 55%, 13% and 46%.
Of note, racial and ethnic differences in nonadherence were appreciably attenuated when medication copayment and mail-order pharmacy were accounted for in the models. "Medication copay mattered for everybody, as did mail-order pharmacy," Adams says.
More Research Needed on How Mail-Order Pharmacy Affects Adherence
She explained, however, that copays differed between individuals, depending on their exact health plans and a number of other variables, but for the most part the actual cost saving was small.
"But it may be due to the combination of reduced copay and convenience, not having to take that extra step of coming into the pharmacy for medication, that might have been the incentive for people to sign up," she noted.
Nevertheless, more research is needed to explore the specific mechanisms by which use of mail-order pharmacy may influence adherence across diverse healthcare settings, she and her colleagues note.
 
Mail-order pharmacy may not be enough if it's not done in the context of having those supports in place to help you with other aspects of self-management.
 
"We are not really sure why some people sign up [for mail-order pharmacy] and some don't," she told heart wire . "Some of the suggestions that have been made include lack of awareness that it exists, concerns about receiving medications in the post--either privacy concerns or concerns that people don’t have a safe place where the post office can leave a package like that. Those are just two possibilities, but we don't really know, and it's something we need to understand."
And she stresses, "mail-order pharmacy is so different depending on the setting. Here we have an engaged team of people focused on hypertension reduction, but it may not work the same for someone who is not connected to an integrated healthcare system. So that is an important distinction to make. Mail-order pharmacy may not be enough if it's not done in the context of having those supports in place to help you with other aspects of self-management."
The authors report that they have no disclosures.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contact Precautions May Have Unintended Consequences

Contact precautions, including gloves, gowns, and isolated rooms, have helped stem the transmission of hospital pathogens but have also had some negative consequences, according to findings from a new study. Healthcare worker (HCWs) visited patients on contact precautions less frequently than other patients and spent less time with those patients when they did visit, report Daniel J. Morgan, MD, from the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, and colleagues. Moreover, patients on contact precautions also received fewer outside visitors. "Less contact with HCWs suggests that other unintended consequences of contact precautions still exist," Dr. Morgan and coauthors write. "The resulting decrease in HCW contact may lead to increased adverse events and a lower quality of patient care due to less consistent patient monitoring and poorer adherence to standard adverse event prevention methods (such

CareFusion Issues Update on Infant Breathing Product Recall

July 5, 2012 — Medical device maker CareFusion has issued an update reminding healthcare providers of its voluntary recall of its Air Life ™ Infant Breathing Circuit, initiated back in May. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified this action as a class 1 recall, meaning there is a reasonable probability of serious adverse health consequences or death associated with use of the defective units. The update was posted July 2 on the FDA  Website. On May 29, 2012, CareFusion sent an  Urgent Recall Notice  to customers and distributors stating that the company had identified potential risks associated with the Air Life  Infant Breathing Circuit. The action was initiated after the company received complaints of the Y adapter within the breathing circuit developing cracks during patient use. "If a crack develops in the Y adapter, this could potentially result in a leak in the closed ventilation system, leading to a loss in the intended tidal volume delivered to

FDA Approves Tapentadol ER for Diabetic Neuropathy

August 29, 2012 — The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tapentadol extended-release (ER) ( Nucynta , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc) for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in adults for whom a continuous opioid analgesic is required over an extended time. It is the first opioid to receive this indication, the company notes in a statement today. DPN, the most common type of neuropathy, affects an estimated 16% of the more than 25 million Americans who have diabetes. The condition is often unreported and untreated, with an estimated 2 out of 5 cases not receiving care. Tapentadol ER is already approved for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain in adults requiring a continuous opioid analgesic for an extended period. It is a centrally acting synthetic analgesic, although the exact mechanism of action is unknown, the release states. "Although the clinical relevance is unclear," the company n