Skip to main content

Steep LDL Drop With Lomitapide in Homozygous FH: Phase 3 Trial Update


May 29, 2012 (Milan, Italy) — More details of the phase 3 study with a new drug for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), lomitapide (Aegerion), showing large reductions in LDL, were presented at the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) 2012 Congress last weekend. Limited preliminary results of the study were released last year and reported then by heartwire .
Lomitapide is one of a cluster of new agents in development that offer the hope of achieving near-normal LDL levels in FH patients. Others include anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease (PCSK9) antibodies in development by Sanofi/Regneron and Amgen and the antisense agent mipomersen(Genzyme).
Presenting the latest data on lomitapide, Dr Marina Cuchel (University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia) said: "These are results that a few years ago we could only dream about in homozygous FH patients."
EAS president Dr John Chapman (Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France) commented to heartwire : "These new drugs on the horizon for homozygous FH are not just promising: they are lifesaving. Homozygous FH is an incredibly severe disease. Life expectancy is very short. We need to the save the lives of these patients. These new drugs can help us achieve that goal."
Lomitapide is an oral inhibitor of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) enzyme that drives lipoprotein production and secretion. Phase 2 studies showed reduction in LDL of 50% to 60% in patients with homozygous FH, but the drug was also associated with a change in liver-fat content. Cuchel noted that this liver-fat effect appeared highly variable--some patients had no change in liver content, and others had a large increase. And there were other factors in some cases that could have influenced the effect, such as alcohol use, and in all cases liver-fat content returned to normal within a few months of drug discontinuation.
In the phase 3 study, lomitapide was titrated up to a maximum dose of 60 mg daily over 26 weeks, then patients were continued on the maximum tolerated dose for another 52 weeks. All patients were advised to eat a low-fat diet and had liver-function tests and liver-fat evaluation by MRI and spectroscopy.
Of 29 homozygous FH patients who started the trial, six discontinued--four because of adverse drug reactions, one withdrew consent, and one was noncompliant.
Average 40% Reduction in LDL
Results at 26 weeks showed an average 40% reduction in LDL with lomitapide. Those who completed the study had a mean reduction of LDL of 52%, with some patients who managed to take 40 to 60 mg achieving up to an 80% LDL reduction, Cuchel reported.
LDL fell from a baseline average of 330 mg/dL to 190 mg/dL at week 26. Eight patients reached levels below 100 mg/dL, and one patient even managed to get below 70 mg/dL.
Of 13 patients receiving LDL apheresis, three reduced the frequency of this intervention and three had stopped apheresis permanently by week 26. "This translates into a great increase in quality of life," Cuchel commented.
There were 23 patients who continued for the next 52-week drug-safety phase. During the whole 78-week treatment time they averaged a 32% LDL reduction. There was a small reduction in HDL, but this went back to baseline once the dose was stabilized, Cuchel noted.
Safety Results
Most patients experienced GI adverse events, but Cuchel said these were not serious. They were mainly mild to moderate diarrhea, nausea, or abdominal discomfort. The adverse events tended to be less during the later part of the trial, which Cuchel suggested meant that patients were adapting to the drug.
ADRs on Lomitapide
Reaction0–26 weeks (n=29)26–78 weeks (n=23)
Any2721
GI2717
Infections1510
Chapman said he did not believe the side effects would be a major issue. "Many of these patients are already being treated with LDL apheresis, where they have to be attached to a machine for three hours at a time, so a few stomachaches are not going to put them off too much."
Although liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were raised, "this did not occur on a substantial or sustained basis," Cuchel reported. Four patients experienced transient ALT levels greater than five times upper limit of normal, but this was reduced with dose interruption. Hepatic fat was raised but tended to stabilize between weeks 26 to 78.
Hepatic Fat Content in Patients on Lomitapide
Time (wk)Hepatic fat content (%)
Baseline0.9
269
567.3
788.2
More Needs to Be Done to Identify FH Patients
Chapman called for more efforts to identify FH patients. "There are greater numbers of these patients than we realize. In many countries, the condition is not diagnosed. The incidence of homozygous FH is thought to be about one in a million, but in certain communities in Lebanon, South Africa, and Quebec it could be more like one in 100."
He added: "We have known that cholesterol is lethal in high concentration for 50 years. The problem is this message is not getting down to the primary-care physician. The diagnosis is often not made until the patient has had a cardiovascular event. That is far too late. Family physicians must seriously investigate the possibility that children of parents with premature cardiovascular disease may present with a severe form of FH. These patients at 20 have the arteries of an 80-year-old."
Chapman expects these new compounds to also be used for the treatment of heterozygous FH. This is estimated to affect about one in 500 individuals, but as it is so underdiagnosed it could actually be much more common, affecting as many as one in 200, thus being one of the most common human genetic diseases, he noted.
Asked whether lomitapide could also be used in non-FH patients who are finding it difficult to reach their LDL goals, Cuchel suggested this may be a possibility in the future. "There is a large unmet need for statin-intolerant patients. But right now the drug is being targeted initially for severe and uncontrolled FH patients," she said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Missing Data Lead FDA Panel to Vote Against Rivaroxaban for ACS May 23, 2012 (Updated May 24, 2012) (Silver Spring, Maryland) — The missing data issues plaguing the ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 trial of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting, the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus clopidogrel, or ticlopidine. Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the ATLAS ACS TIMI 46 phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage, but the studies were hindered by early patient withdrawals and missing data. We Don't Know What We're Missing Based on the ATLAS ACS 2 results, FDA reviewer Dr Karen Hicks recommended approval of rivaroxaban for the requested indications except all-cause mortality. However, another FDA reviewer, Dr Thomas Marciniak, was adamant that the trial results are not interpretable because about 12% of the patients had incomplete follow-up, far higher than the 1% to 1.5% differences in the end-point rates between rivaroxaban and placebo. A total of 1294 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, and the company was only able to contact 183, of which 177 were confirmed to be alive. Because of the patient dropouts, the company adopted a "modified intention-to-treat analysis," whereby patients were observed for 30 days after randomization or the global end date for the trial, instead of observing all the patients until the end of the trial as the FDA originally suggested. Marciniak criticized the sponsor's efforts to follow the patients and said that three patient deaths not counted in the modified intention-to-treat analysis may just be the "tip of the iceberg." Because the percentage of patients whose ultimate vital status remains unknown is much greater than the reported differences in mortality rates, the claimed mortality benefits are not reliable. The majority of the panel sided with Marciniak. For example, Dr Sanjay Kaul (University of California, Los Angeles) voted "no" because "there was enough uncertainty in the quality and robustness of the data that dissuaded me from voting yes. . . . The 'missingness' of the data doesn't invalidate it, but it certainly makes it hard to infer [the conclusion]." Dr Steven Nissen (Cleveland Clinic, OH) said that the decision to use the modified intention-to-treat analysis had a "profound impact" on the interpretability of the data. "It's saying we don't care what happens after 30 days, [and] that colored the trial in ways we couldn't recover from." Given the risk of major bleeding, "I want to see better evidence that this strategy of adding an Xa inhibitor or a direct thrombin inhibitor or something else to a good antiplatelet agent is robustly better for the patient," Nissen said. He recommends that the companies run a new trial of the 2.5 twice-daily dose of rivaroxaban using a strict intention-to-treat approach, but, he said, "I don't expect the death benefit to be too robust." Several panelists said they were concerned that the patients who dropped out of the trial were disproportionately likely to have a bleeding event, which led them to quit the trial, or a "protopathic" event, as statistician Dr Scott Emerson (University of Washington, Seattle) put it. "We're worried that an impending event is what is changing their behavior. We see that all the time in clinical trials--that regularly measured end points do not pick up [all of] the events," he said. He said that since the company was only able to contact 183 of the over 1200 patients who dropped out, it is possible that the dropouts skew the outcomes comparison of the trial. "Differential event rates after dropout are the number-one thing we're afraid of, so you have to explore it" in a statistical sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of these unknown outcomes. "It would not surprise me if, at the end of the day, these data did not hold up under a proper sensitivity analysis," he said. "What I want to know is, among the people who had events, how differential was the follow-up, but I can tell you by just looking at it, there was a very slightly different amount of follow-up of the people in the treatment arm. But I don't know whether everyone in the treatment arm was cured and they were trekking in the Himalayas and everyone in the placebo arm went home to die. I don't know that that's not the case." Dr Maury Krantz (University of Colorado, Denver) voted in favor of approval but said he does not know how rivaroxaban would perform in general clinical practice, especially when used with aspirin and clopidogrel. "I felt very much torn by this. This isn't a simple paradigm shift. It means going to triple therapy, which is really a three-headed monster in many ways. I think that what you're going to see in practice, if this is not done carefully with the proper labeling and secondary studies, is really dramatic magnification of bleeding and perhaps minimization of the efficacy benefit."

May 23, 2012   (Updated May 24, 2012)  (Silver Spring, Maryland)  —  The missing data issues plaguing the  ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51   trial of the factor Xa inhibitor  rivaroxaban  (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the  FDA  Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting , the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus  clopidogrel , or  ticlopidine . Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the  ATLAS ACS TIMI 46   phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the ri...

Antidepressants Linked to Higher Diabetes Risk in Kids

Pediatric patients who use antidepressants may have an elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, the authors of a new study report. In a retrospective cohort study of more than 119,000 youths 5 to 20 years of age, the risk for incident type 2 diabetes was nearly twice as high among current users of certain types of antidepressants as among former users, Mehmet Burcu, PhD, and colleagues report in an article  published online October 16 in  JAMA Pediatrics . The risk intensified with increasing duration of use, greater cumulative doses, and higher daily doses of these antidepressants. The findings point to a growing need for closer monitoring of these products, including greater balancing of risks and benefits, in the pediatric population, the authors caution. They undertook the study because, despite growing evidence of an association between antidepressant use and an increased risk for type 2 diabetes in adults, similar research in pediatric patients was scarce. "To our know...

Sitting at Work Raises All-Cause and CV Mortality Risk

May 21, 2012 (Lyon, France) — Sitting at work raises the risk of dying from cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic diseases, as well as the risk of dying from all causes, regardless of any exercise in which the individual may engage. That was the finding of a study reported here at the 19th European Congress on Obesity (ECO) by Anne Grunseit, PhD, from the Prevention Research Collaboration in the School of Public Health at the University of Sydney, Australia, and Norwegian colleagues. Research is increasingly focusing on sedentary behavior with low energy expenditure, including sitting and lying down, as behavioral risk factors for obesity and chronic disease. Sitting occurs during travel, while watching television, using computers, and reading. But with people often spending at least 9 hours a day at work, with fewer than 20% of jobs requiring physical exertion, and with many people spending at least 4 hours a day sitting at work, the sedentary time at work is high, and many people ar...