Skip to main content

Study Supports Need for HCV Testing Guidance

March 28, 2012 (New York, New York) — In the United States, testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is happening most often in the people least likely to be infected with the virus, according to a study presented here at the International Conference on Viral Hepatitis 2012.
"Hepatitis C is primarily a disease of older men, but they aren't the ones actually getting tested. The majority of testing is happening in young women. I'm not sure anyone has ever shown this before," study presenter Camilla S. Graham, MD, MPH, from Vertex Pharmaceuticals in Cambridge, Massachusetts, told Medscape Medical News.
There is a need for targeted age-based guidelines for HCV testing, Dr. Graham said. Roy M. Gulick, MD, from Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, agrees. "Focused testing for hepatitis C makes sense," he told attendees during his keynote address. HCV testing recommendations are currently being developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Wrong Sex, Wrong Age Group
An estimated 4.1 million Americans (1.6% of the population) are infected with HCV; the majority of these individuals were born between 1945 and 1965. Dr. Graham said the goal of her study was "to see who exactly is being tested in the United States right now."
She and her colleagues analyzed HCV testing and diagnosis rates in the commercially insured and Medicare populations from 2004 to 2008 using the Thomson Medstat MarketScan commercial database and the Medicare 5% database.
They identified individuals tested for HCV using outpatient claims with Current Procedural Terminology codes for anti-HCV antibody or HCV RNA diagnostic tests. They used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes to identify individuals diagnosed with HCV infection.
They found that in 2008, the HCV testing rate was 1.1% in the commercially insured population and 1.7% in the Medicare population, which might explain the high proportion of undiagnosed individuals, the researchers say.
"Overall, practically nobody was getting tested, although it went up from 2004 to 2008. There are other data to support this level of testing in the United States," Dr. Graham noted.
Only 32.8% of the tests were performed in baby boomers born between 1945 and 1965, who are at the highest risk for HCV infection; 48.2% of HCV tests were performed in individuals born between 1970 and 1989.
"Eighty-one percent of people with hepatitis C in this country were born between 1945 and 1965, but we found that only a third of the tests were actually happening in that age group," Dr. Graham told Medscape Medical News. "Conversely, younger people had almost half of the tests."
In the younger (commercially insured) population, women were more likely than men to be tested; 62.0% of HCV tests were performed in women, most of whom were in their reproductive years. In the Medicare population, testing was more evenly distributed between men and women.
As expected, rates of diagnosis were consistently higher in the older (Medicare) population — the baby boomers — than in the younger population. They were also higher in men.
Women and men born between 1970 and 1989 had a 0.45% and 1.18% rate, respectively, of HCV diagnosis after testing. "Almost none of these young women had hepatitis C," Dr. Graham noted. "But when you look at the baby boomer men, between 5.7% and 7.4% of them had hepatitis C."
Help on the Way
Dr. Graham noted that "an estimated 800,000 people in the United States have cirrhosis. Within the next 10 years, it will be about 1 million people, and 75% of those people are men. Men are disproportionately likely to have hepatitis C and disproportionately more likely to develop severe fibrosis with hepatitis C."
"Clearly, we need a lot of education on who to test for hepatitis C," Dr. Graham said, adding that the forthcoming age-based screening guidelines for HCV testing should help. "The focus will be on people born between 1945 and 1965 who are at highest risk for the infection. We should have them sometime this year," Dr. Graham said.
Dr. Graham reports being an employee and stock owner of Vertex Pharmaceuticals, which commissioned the study. Dr. Gulick reports financial relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., and ViiV Healthcare.
International Conference on Viral Hepatitis (ICVH) 2012: Abstract 79332. Presented March 27, 2012.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contact Precautions May Have Unintended Consequences

Contact precautions, including gloves, gowns, and isolated rooms, have helped stem the transmission of hospital pathogens but have also had some negative consequences, according to findings from a new study. Healthcare worker (HCWs) visited patients on contact precautions less frequently than other patients and spent less time with those patients when they did visit, report Daniel J. Morgan, MD, from the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, and colleagues. Moreover, patients on contact precautions also received fewer outside visitors. "Less contact with HCWs suggests that other unintended consequences of contact precautions still exist," Dr. Morgan and coauthors write. "The resulting decrease in HCW contact may lead to increased adverse events and a lower quality of patient care due to less consistent patient monitoring and poorer adherence to standard adverse event prevention methods (such...

Antidepressants Linked to Higher Diabetes Risk in Kids

Pediatric patients who use antidepressants may have an elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, the authors of a new study report. In a retrospective cohort study of more than 119,000 youths 5 to 20 years of age, the risk for incident type 2 diabetes was nearly twice as high among current users of certain types of antidepressants as among former users, Mehmet Burcu, PhD, and colleagues report in an article  published online October 16 in  JAMA Pediatrics . The risk intensified with increasing duration of use, greater cumulative doses, and higher daily doses of these antidepressants. The findings point to a growing need for closer monitoring of these products, including greater balancing of risks and benefits, in the pediatric population, the authors caution. They undertook the study because, despite growing evidence of an association between antidepressant use and an increased risk for type 2 diabetes in adults, similar research in pediatric patients was scarce. "To our know...

Missing Data Lead FDA Panel to Vote Against Rivaroxaban for ACS May 23, 2012 (Updated May 24, 2012) (Silver Spring, Maryland) — The missing data issues plaguing the ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 trial of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting, the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus clopidogrel, or ticlopidine. Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the ATLAS ACS TIMI 46 phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage, but the studies were hindered by early patient withdrawals and missing data. We Don't Know What We're Missing Based on the ATLAS ACS 2 results, FDA reviewer Dr Karen Hicks recommended approval of rivaroxaban for the requested indications except all-cause mortality. However, another FDA reviewer, Dr Thomas Marciniak, was adamant that the trial results are not interpretable because about 12% of the patients had incomplete follow-up, far higher than the 1% to 1.5% differences in the end-point rates between rivaroxaban and placebo. A total of 1294 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, and the company was only able to contact 183, of which 177 were confirmed to be alive. Because of the patient dropouts, the company adopted a "modified intention-to-treat analysis," whereby patients were observed for 30 days after randomization or the global end date for the trial, instead of observing all the patients until the end of the trial as the FDA originally suggested. Marciniak criticized the sponsor's efforts to follow the patients and said that three patient deaths not counted in the modified intention-to-treat analysis may just be the "tip of the iceberg." Because the percentage of patients whose ultimate vital status remains unknown is much greater than the reported differences in mortality rates, the claimed mortality benefits are not reliable. The majority of the panel sided with Marciniak. For example, Dr Sanjay Kaul (University of California, Los Angeles) voted "no" because "there was enough uncertainty in the quality and robustness of the data that dissuaded me from voting yes. . . . The 'missingness' of the data doesn't invalidate it, but it certainly makes it hard to infer [the conclusion]." Dr Steven Nissen (Cleveland Clinic, OH) said that the decision to use the modified intention-to-treat analysis had a "profound impact" on the interpretability of the data. "It's saying we don't care what happens after 30 days, [and] that colored the trial in ways we couldn't recover from." Given the risk of major bleeding, "I want to see better evidence that this strategy of adding an Xa inhibitor or a direct thrombin inhibitor or something else to a good antiplatelet agent is robustly better for the patient," Nissen said. He recommends that the companies run a new trial of the 2.5 twice-daily dose of rivaroxaban using a strict intention-to-treat approach, but, he said, "I don't expect the death benefit to be too robust." Several panelists said they were concerned that the patients who dropped out of the trial were disproportionately likely to have a bleeding event, which led them to quit the trial, or a "protopathic" event, as statistician Dr Scott Emerson (University of Washington, Seattle) put it. "We're worried that an impending event is what is changing their behavior. We see that all the time in clinical trials--that regularly measured end points do not pick up [all of] the events," he said. He said that since the company was only able to contact 183 of the over 1200 patients who dropped out, it is possible that the dropouts skew the outcomes comparison of the trial. "Differential event rates after dropout are the number-one thing we're afraid of, so you have to explore it" in a statistical sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of these unknown outcomes. "It would not surprise me if, at the end of the day, these data did not hold up under a proper sensitivity analysis," he said. "What I want to know is, among the people who had events, how differential was the follow-up, but I can tell you by just looking at it, there was a very slightly different amount of follow-up of the people in the treatment arm. But I don't know whether everyone in the treatment arm was cured and they were trekking in the Himalayas and everyone in the placebo arm went home to die. I don't know that that's not the case." Dr Maury Krantz (University of Colorado, Denver) voted in favor of approval but said he does not know how rivaroxaban would perform in general clinical practice, especially when used with aspirin and clopidogrel. "I felt very much torn by this. This isn't a simple paradigm shift. It means going to triple therapy, which is really a three-headed monster in many ways. I think that what you're going to see in practice, if this is not done carefully with the proper labeling and secondary studies, is really dramatic magnification of bleeding and perhaps minimization of the efficacy benefit."

May 23, 2012   (Updated May 24, 2012)  (Silver Spring, Maryland)  —  The missing data issues plaguing the  ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51   trial of the factor Xa inhibitor  rivaroxaban  (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the  FDA  Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting , the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus  clopidogrel , or  ticlopidine . Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the  ATLAS ACS TIMI 46   phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the ri...