Skip to main content

Doubt Raised About FDA's Recommendation for Antipsychotics

March 28, 2012 (Washington, DC) — Discontinuing risperidone (Risperdal, Janssen Pharmaceuticals) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who have psychosis or agitation/aggression significantly increases the risk for relapse in these behavioral symptoms, new research shows.
In a study funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of patients with AD who were treated for 4 months previously with risperidone, there was a significantly greater rate of relapse in psychosis and agitation symptoms in patients who were switched to placebo compared with those who continued receiving the active drug. The placebo-treated group also had a shorter time to relapse.
Treatment-related adverse events did not differ significantly between the 2 groups up to 32 weeks later.
Presented here at the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP) 2012 Annual Meeting, the findings appear to be contrary to current guidelines, which recommend that clinicians try to ease AD patients off of antipsychotics as soon as possible.
"This is one of the first studies to really address this issue directly," co-investigator Davangere P. Devanand, MD, professor of clinical psychiatry and neurology at Columbia University in New York City and director of the Division of Geriatric Psychiatry at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, told meeting delegates.
"So our way of thinking is that federal regulations urging early antipsychotic discontinuation may need reconsideration. Our findings certainly raise questions," said Dr. Devanand.
FDA Warning
According to the investigators, psychosis or agitation/aggression in patients with AD can lead to more rapid cognitive decline, future institutionalization, and increased healthcare costs.
However, there are currently no medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat these symptoms in this patient population, said Dr. Devanand.
"Behavioral interventions may be useful, but well-controlled research evidence supporting these approaches is limited," he said.
Although previous research has shown that antipsychotics are the only medications that are superior to placebo in this patient population, the effect size has not been robust. In addition, the agents' efficacy "needs to be weighed against sedation, neurological side effects, and metabolic syndrome."
Further, antipsychotics currently carry a black box warning from the FDA about increased mortality risk, based on pooled clinical trials.
"In other words, federal regulations urge discontinuation after a few months," said Dr. Devanand.
He noted that although previous antipsychotic discontinuation trials have shown mixed results, most did not establish that a treatment response had been achieved before discontinuation. In addition, most of the trials included patients who did not have baseline symptoms of psychosis or agitation and had been receiving antipsychotics "for several years" and/or looked at the discontinuation of several different medications.
"Patients in the US get a bunch of psychotropics and antipsychotics frequently. So discontinuation becomes very complicated. And it can be difficult to interpret which drug is doing what," he said.
Significant Relapse Rate
The Antipsychotic Discontinuation in Alzheimer's Disease Trial had an initial open-label phase in which 180 patients older than 49 years who had probable AD and symptoms of psychosis or agitation/aggression received risperidone (0.25 - 3 mg/day).
Baseline symptoms of psychosis were determined with a score of 4 or higher on delusions or hallucinations on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) rating scale, and symptoms of behavioral dyscontrol were determined by a score of 4 or higher on agitation/aggression on the NPI. Exclusion criteria included stroke, transient ischemic attack, or uncontrolled atrial fibrillation.
Participants who responded to treatment at the 16-week mark (n = 110; mean age, 79.9 years; ≥30% decline in NPI core scores) were than randomly assigned to continue receiving risperidone (mean dose, 0.97 mg/day) or were switched to a matching placebo.
All patients were then examined 16 weeks and 32 weeks after randomization. Relapse was defined as a 30% or greater increase in NPI core score and a significant change on psychosis/agitation scores.
Results showed that in the first 16 weeks after randomization, "the time to relapse and risk of relapse favored risperidone over placebo," reported Dr. Devanand.
The relative hazards ratio for relapse for the placebo group was 1.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 - 3.45; P = .022).
In addition, 60% of the patients receiving placebo experienced relapse compared with 32.9% of those receiving risperidone (P = .004).
"In other words, the placebo group was almost twice as likely to relapse as the patients on risperidone," said Dr. Devanand.
At the 32-week post-randomization point, the relative hazards ratio for those receiving placebo vs those receiving risperidone was 4.88 (95% CI, 1.08 - 21.98; P = .023). The relapse rates were 48% vs 15% for placebo and risperidone, respectively (P = .017).
Throughout the entire post-randomization period, there were 11 serious adverse events (SAEs) reported, including 3 deaths (2 patients were receiving risperidone and 1 was receiving placebo). There were no significant between-group differences in SAEs for either 16-week examination period.
There were also no significant differences between the 2 groups in adjusted scores on the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, and the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale, nor were there significance differences in extrapyramidal symptoms on the Simpson-Angus Scale or in body weight.
FDA Response
"Looking at it in context of current federal regulations, if someone actually has these symptoms, you treat with an antipsychotic for 4 months. If they're doing better in terms of the symptoms and side effects are not terrible, then you're supposed to discontinue use of the medication," said Dr. Devanand.
"But our findings suggest that discontinuing means you're more likely to relapse. Although we did not see any difference in side effects, that is still a somewhat open question. So you have to weigh the risk of relapse with risk of side effects after long-term treatment for your individual patient."
During the question-and-answer session after his presentation, Dr. Devanand was asked to speak more about the current FDA black box warning.
"I think we should think of this warning as a starting point. My understanding is that the FDA based this on specific data from certain studies. And perhaps more research is needed to address that," he answered.
That set the stage for a brief discussion by Ni Khin, MD, medical team leader in the Division of Psychiatry Products at the FDA, who told attendees that that she was speaking "on my views and not the official views of the FDA."
"The efficacy of antipsychotics for symptoms of psychosis and behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's patients has not been established yet in FDA-registration trials," said Dr. Khin.
"In 2005, we put a box warning out based on 17 trials that showed an increase in mortality and cardiovascular effect."
She noted that in the current study, only the initial treatment responders were randomly assigned into the discontinuation phase of the trial. She also pointed out that although 60% of the patients receiving risperidone did not relapse, over 30% of those receiving placebo also did not relapse.
"The main question we often face is: if patients are responding to treatment, how long should we go on treating them? Also, when looking at results from this study, it's important to ask if there was any patient selection bias," said Dr. Khin.
Individual Approach
"Science looking to prove the effectiveness of this drug might be missing some important variables. But I can tell you this: I give Depakote [divalproex sodium]. I give Risperdal [risperidone]. And 70% to 80% of my patients do well, even though you scientifically can't seem to demonstrate how I'm doing that," said Gerald Plovsky, MD, adult and geriatric psychiatrist in private practice in Greensboro, North Carolina, to thunderous applause from the audience during the session's discussion period.
Dr. Devanand replied that it is much harder to find a significant response when comparing a medication against placebo than it is with open-label treatment.
Dr. Plovsky later told Medscape Medical News that "researchers care about what happens to a population. In clinical practice, we care about the individual."
"I think this study is great because it justifies why geriatric psychiatrists are so important. We take the time to get to know the patients, and we do things slowly and cautiously," said Dr. Plovsky, who is also the former director of the Public Mental Health Clinic for Geriatrics in Greensboro.
"The bottom line is, I think when you take people off these drugs, you should go slowly. If you go quickly, then people get sick. And it's pros and cons when it comes to the decisions we make. Over the years, I have used Risperidol, and I think it's saved many people a lot of disaster. And I've rarely seen an adverse side effect from it as long as you give 1 or 2 mg," he concluded.
This study was supported by grants from the NIH and by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The medications were provided by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, "which had no other role in the study," report the investigators. Dr. Devanand reported having received research support from Eli Lilly. Dr. Plovsky has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP) 2012 Annual Meeting. Session 201. Presented March 17, 2012.

Authors and Disclosures

Journalist

Deborah Brauser

is a freelance writer for Medscape.

Deborah Brauser has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antidepressants Linked to Higher Diabetes Risk in Kids

Pediatric patients who use antidepressants may have an elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, the authors of a new study report. In a retrospective cohort study of more than 119,000 youths 5 to 20 years of age, the risk for incident type 2 diabetes was nearly twice as high among current users of certain types of antidepressants as among former users, Mehmet Burcu, PhD, and colleagues report in an article  published online October 16 in  JAMA Pediatrics . The risk intensified with increasing duration of use, greater cumulative doses, and higher daily doses of these antidepressants. The findings point to a growing need for closer monitoring of these products, including greater balancing of risks and benefits, in the pediatric population, the authors caution. They undertook the study because, despite growing evidence of an association between antidepressant use and an increased risk for type 2 diabetes in adults, similar research in pediatric patients was scarce. "To our know...

Contact Precautions May Have Unintended Consequences

Contact precautions, including gloves, gowns, and isolated rooms, have helped stem the transmission of hospital pathogens but have also had some negative consequences, according to findings from a new study. Healthcare worker (HCWs) visited patients on contact precautions less frequently than other patients and spent less time with those patients when they did visit, report Daniel J. Morgan, MD, from the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, and colleagues. Moreover, patients on contact precautions also received fewer outside visitors. "Less contact with HCWs suggests that other unintended consequences of contact precautions still exist," Dr. Morgan and coauthors write. "The resulting decrease in HCW contact may lead to increased adverse events and a lower quality of patient care due to less consistent patient monitoring and poorer adherence to standard adverse event prevention methods (such...

Missing Data Lead FDA Panel to Vote Against Rivaroxaban for ACS May 23, 2012 (Updated May 24, 2012) (Silver Spring, Maryland) — The missing data issues plaguing the ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 trial of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting, the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus clopidogrel, or ticlopidine. Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the ATLAS ACS TIMI 46 phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage, but the studies were hindered by early patient withdrawals and missing data. We Don't Know What We're Missing Based on the ATLAS ACS 2 results, FDA reviewer Dr Karen Hicks recommended approval of rivaroxaban for the requested indications except all-cause mortality. However, another FDA reviewer, Dr Thomas Marciniak, was adamant that the trial results are not interpretable because about 12% of the patients had incomplete follow-up, far higher than the 1% to 1.5% differences in the end-point rates between rivaroxaban and placebo. A total of 1294 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, and the company was only able to contact 183, of which 177 were confirmed to be alive. Because of the patient dropouts, the company adopted a "modified intention-to-treat analysis," whereby patients were observed for 30 days after randomization or the global end date for the trial, instead of observing all the patients until the end of the trial as the FDA originally suggested. Marciniak criticized the sponsor's efforts to follow the patients and said that three patient deaths not counted in the modified intention-to-treat analysis may just be the "tip of the iceberg." Because the percentage of patients whose ultimate vital status remains unknown is much greater than the reported differences in mortality rates, the claimed mortality benefits are not reliable. The majority of the panel sided with Marciniak. For example, Dr Sanjay Kaul (University of California, Los Angeles) voted "no" because "there was enough uncertainty in the quality and robustness of the data that dissuaded me from voting yes. . . . The 'missingness' of the data doesn't invalidate it, but it certainly makes it hard to infer [the conclusion]." Dr Steven Nissen (Cleveland Clinic, OH) said that the decision to use the modified intention-to-treat analysis had a "profound impact" on the interpretability of the data. "It's saying we don't care what happens after 30 days, [and] that colored the trial in ways we couldn't recover from." Given the risk of major bleeding, "I want to see better evidence that this strategy of adding an Xa inhibitor or a direct thrombin inhibitor or something else to a good antiplatelet agent is robustly better for the patient," Nissen said. He recommends that the companies run a new trial of the 2.5 twice-daily dose of rivaroxaban using a strict intention-to-treat approach, but, he said, "I don't expect the death benefit to be too robust." Several panelists said they were concerned that the patients who dropped out of the trial were disproportionately likely to have a bleeding event, which led them to quit the trial, or a "protopathic" event, as statistician Dr Scott Emerson (University of Washington, Seattle) put it. "We're worried that an impending event is what is changing their behavior. We see that all the time in clinical trials--that regularly measured end points do not pick up [all of] the events," he said. He said that since the company was only able to contact 183 of the over 1200 patients who dropped out, it is possible that the dropouts skew the outcomes comparison of the trial. "Differential event rates after dropout are the number-one thing we're afraid of, so you have to explore it" in a statistical sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of these unknown outcomes. "It would not surprise me if, at the end of the day, these data did not hold up under a proper sensitivity analysis," he said. "What I want to know is, among the people who had events, how differential was the follow-up, but I can tell you by just looking at it, there was a very slightly different amount of follow-up of the people in the treatment arm. But I don't know whether everyone in the treatment arm was cured and they were trekking in the Himalayas and everyone in the placebo arm went home to die. I don't know that that's not the case." Dr Maury Krantz (University of Colorado, Denver) voted in favor of approval but said he does not know how rivaroxaban would perform in general clinical practice, especially when used with aspirin and clopidogrel. "I felt very much torn by this. This isn't a simple paradigm shift. It means going to triple therapy, which is really a three-headed monster in many ways. I think that what you're going to see in practice, if this is not done carefully with the proper labeling and secondary studies, is really dramatic magnification of bleeding and perhaps minimization of the efficacy benefit."

May 23, 2012   (Updated May 24, 2012)  (Silver Spring, Maryland)  —  The missing data issues plaguing the  ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51   trial of the factor Xa inhibitor  rivaroxaban  (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the  FDA  Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting , the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus  clopidogrel , or  ticlopidine . Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the  ATLAS ACS TIMI 46   phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the ri...