Skip to main content

Quizartinib: Surprising, Unprecedented Activity in Relapsed AML Clinician Desperate to Use


ATLANTA, Georgia — The investigational agent quizartinib (Astellas/Ambit) has shown unprecedented activity in patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a phase 2 clinical trial.
On the basis of these results, larger phase 3 clinical trials with the drug are being planned, according to Astellas/Ambit.
Patients with AML can develop many different genetic mutations, but one of the most threatening is FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITD), which makes the leukemia even more aggressive and typically leads to resistance to standard chemotherapy. This mutation develops in 34% of AML patients and is associated with more rapid relapse and reduced overall survival, explained lead author Mark Levis, MD, PhD, associate professor of oncology, pharmacology, and medicine at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.
"Quizartinib is the first and only single-agent drug that has produced a clinical benefit in AML patients with this deadly mutation who have failed previous therapy," he said. "It caught us by surprise how well it worked."
Dr. Levis presented results from a large phase 2 study of patients with relapsed or refractory AML here at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) 54th Annual Meeting. Many patients achieved a complete response to quizartinib, and one third were stabilized with quizartinib for long enough to undergo potentially life-saving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
"The number of patients bridged to a transplant was very significant," Dr. Levis said in a statement. "We plan on using these encouraging results to design and conduct additional randomized trials that will hopefully lead to the approval of quizartinib to make it accessible for patients who previously had no hope for a cure," he added.
 
I am desperate to get this drug in the clinic.Dr. Mark Levis
 
"I am desperate to get this drug in the clinic.... I treat mainly a refractory patient population, and this is the drug that I want to use in them," he explained.
Patients with a FLT3 mutation present a "major management problem," said ASH president Armand Keating, MD, professor of medicine and director of hematology at the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada. "You can put them in remission, but then they relapse...and the disease progresses so quickly that they don't get a chance for transplant and for cure," he said.
"This study is important because it shows that quizartinib can stabilize these patients for long enough to do a transplant. It shows that this is possible in about a third of patients," Dr. Keating reported. It is another example of a new drug offering fresh hope for a hard-to-heal patient population, he said at a premeeting press briefing.
Mutation Is Like a Power Switch
"The FTL3 mutation is essentially a power switch that leukemia cells use to spread more aggressively and helps them to grow back immediately after chemotherapy," Dr. Levis explained. "The only way to treat this type of mutation is to find a way to turn the switch off — a feat that has eluded researchers for far too long."
Quizartinib appears to do just that. It was designed to "turn off" the mutated FLT3 enzyme, which forces the immature cancer cells to die immediately or to undergo maturation and then die. This eliminates enough cancer cells to stabilize the patient for long enough to offer them another treatment, including transplantation.
The phase 2 study of quizartinib was conducted in AML patients who had relapsed, did not respond to second-line therapy, or had relapsed after HSCT. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 133 were older than 60 years, and 137 were 18 to 60 years.
Dr. Levis presented data from the younger cohort. Of the 137 patients, 99 had the FLT3 mutation and 38 did not.
Oral quizartinib was used alone at a starting dose of 135 mg/day for men and 90 mg/day for women, and was given continuously in 28-day cycles. The difference in the dose between the sexes relates to an adverse cardiac effect of the drug; quizartinib can cause a prolongation of the QT interval on electrocardiogram, and women are more sensitive to this effect than men, Dr. Levis explained.
The drug elicited responses in patients with and without the mutation, but the responses were better in those with the mutation. The primary end point was a composite complete remission rate (CR), which included complete remission with no active disease, complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (so no active disease but an incomplete platelet count), and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (no active disease but abnormal red and white blood cells counts).
For the 99 patients who had the FLT3 mutation, the composite CR was 44% (4% with CR, 0% with incomplete platelet recovery, and 40% with incomplete hematologic recovery). The median duration of response was 11.3 weeks and median overall survival was 23.1 weeks.
For the 38 patients without the mutation, the composite CR was 34% (3% with CR, 3% with incomplete platelet recovery, and 29% with incomplete hematologic recovery). The median duration of response was 5.0 weeks and median overall survival 25.6 weeks.
Of the 137 patients 18 to 60 years of age, 47 (34%) underwent HSCT after responding to quizartinib. Some of these patients have survived more than 2 years without any disease recurrence, Dr. Levis said.
Adverse events included nausea (reported by 38% of patients), anemia (29%), QT prolongation (26%), vomiting (26%), febrile neutropenia (25%), diarrhea (20%), and fatigue (20%). Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in 10% of patients.
Quizartinib was "extremely well tolerated," Dr. Levis noted. The main adverse events are the QT prolongation and myelosuppression, but these are "manageable," he said.
"We are still playing around with the dose," he explained. A future trial will look at using lower doses of the drug, and a randomized trial of 30 mg vs 60 mg is planned.
The findings from this phase 2 trial of quizartinib in patients with relapsed and refractory AML are "especially encouraging," said Jorge Cortes, MD, deputy chair in the Department of Leukemia at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, in a statement. "In the patients with theFLT3-ITD mutation, quizartinib represents the most active single agent we have observed with any class of investigational drugs in this challenging patient population," he added.
The study was funded by Astellas/Ambit, the developers of quizartinib. Dr. Levis reports consultancy for Ambit Biosciences. Several of his coauthors are company employees. Dr. Keating reports serving on the data safety monitoring board for Clavis, Novartis, and Pfizer.
American Society of Hematology (ASH) 54th Annual Meeting: Abstract 673. Presented December 10, 2012.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Missing Data Lead FDA Panel to Vote Against Rivaroxaban for ACS May 23, 2012 (Updated May 24, 2012) (Silver Spring, Maryland) — The missing data issues plaguing the ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 trial of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting, the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus clopidogrel, or ticlopidine. Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the ATLAS ACS TIMI 46 phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage, but the studies were hindered by early patient withdrawals and missing data. We Don't Know What We're Missing Based on the ATLAS ACS 2 results, FDA reviewer Dr Karen Hicks recommended approval of rivaroxaban for the requested indications except all-cause mortality. However, another FDA reviewer, Dr Thomas Marciniak, was adamant that the trial results are not interpretable because about 12% of the patients had incomplete follow-up, far higher than the 1% to 1.5% differences in the end-point rates between rivaroxaban and placebo. A total of 1294 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, and the company was only able to contact 183, of which 177 were confirmed to be alive. Because of the patient dropouts, the company adopted a "modified intention-to-treat analysis," whereby patients were observed for 30 days after randomization or the global end date for the trial, instead of observing all the patients until the end of the trial as the FDA originally suggested. Marciniak criticized the sponsor's efforts to follow the patients and said that three patient deaths not counted in the modified intention-to-treat analysis may just be the "tip of the iceberg." Because the percentage of patients whose ultimate vital status remains unknown is much greater than the reported differences in mortality rates, the claimed mortality benefits are not reliable. The majority of the panel sided with Marciniak. For example, Dr Sanjay Kaul (University of California, Los Angeles) voted "no" because "there was enough uncertainty in the quality and robustness of the data that dissuaded me from voting yes. . . . The 'missingness' of the data doesn't invalidate it, but it certainly makes it hard to infer [the conclusion]." Dr Steven Nissen (Cleveland Clinic, OH) said that the decision to use the modified intention-to-treat analysis had a "profound impact" on the interpretability of the data. "It's saying we don't care what happens after 30 days, [and] that colored the trial in ways we couldn't recover from." Given the risk of major bleeding, "I want to see better evidence that this strategy of adding an Xa inhibitor or a direct thrombin inhibitor or something else to a good antiplatelet agent is robustly better for the patient," Nissen said. He recommends that the companies run a new trial of the 2.5 twice-daily dose of rivaroxaban using a strict intention-to-treat approach, but, he said, "I don't expect the death benefit to be too robust." Several panelists said they were concerned that the patients who dropped out of the trial were disproportionately likely to have a bleeding event, which led them to quit the trial, or a "protopathic" event, as statistician Dr Scott Emerson (University of Washington, Seattle) put it. "We're worried that an impending event is what is changing their behavior. We see that all the time in clinical trials--that regularly measured end points do not pick up [all of] the events," he said. He said that since the company was only able to contact 183 of the over 1200 patients who dropped out, it is possible that the dropouts skew the outcomes comparison of the trial. "Differential event rates after dropout are the number-one thing we're afraid of, so you have to explore it" in a statistical sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of these unknown outcomes. "It would not surprise me if, at the end of the day, these data did not hold up under a proper sensitivity analysis," he said. "What I want to know is, among the people who had events, how differential was the follow-up, but I can tell you by just looking at it, there was a very slightly different amount of follow-up of the people in the treatment arm. But I don't know whether everyone in the treatment arm was cured and they were trekking in the Himalayas and everyone in the placebo arm went home to die. I don't know that that's not the case." Dr Maury Krantz (University of Colorado, Denver) voted in favor of approval but said he does not know how rivaroxaban would perform in general clinical practice, especially when used with aspirin and clopidogrel. "I felt very much torn by this. This isn't a simple paradigm shift. It means going to triple therapy, which is really a three-headed monster in many ways. I think that what you're going to see in practice, if this is not done carefully with the proper labeling and secondary studies, is really dramatic magnification of bleeding and perhaps minimization of the efficacy benefit."

May 23, 2012   (Updated May 24, 2012)  (Silver Spring, Maryland)  —  The missing data issues plaguing the  ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51   trial of the factor Xa inhibitor  rivaroxaban  (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the  FDA  Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting , the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus  clopidogrel , or  ticlopidine . Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the  ATLAS ACS TIMI 46   phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the ri...

Antidepressants Linked to Higher Diabetes Risk in Kids

Pediatric patients who use antidepressants may have an elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, the authors of a new study report. In a retrospective cohort study of more than 119,000 youths 5 to 20 years of age, the risk for incident type 2 diabetes was nearly twice as high among current users of certain types of antidepressants as among former users, Mehmet Burcu, PhD, and colleagues report in an article  published online October 16 in  JAMA Pediatrics . The risk intensified with increasing duration of use, greater cumulative doses, and higher daily doses of these antidepressants. The findings point to a growing need for closer monitoring of these products, including greater balancing of risks and benefits, in the pediatric population, the authors caution. They undertook the study because, despite growing evidence of an association between antidepressant use and an increased risk for type 2 diabetes in adults, similar research in pediatric patients was scarce. "To our know...

Contact Precautions May Have Unintended Consequences

Contact precautions, including gloves, gowns, and isolated rooms, have helped stem the transmission of hospital pathogens but have also had some negative consequences, according to findings from a new study. Healthcare worker (HCWs) visited patients on contact precautions less frequently than other patients and spent less time with those patients when they did visit, report Daniel J. Morgan, MD, from the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, and colleagues. Moreover, patients on contact precautions also received fewer outside visitors. "Less contact with HCWs suggests that other unintended consequences of contact precautions still exist," Dr. Morgan and coauthors write. "The resulting decrease in HCW contact may lead to increased adverse events and a lower quality of patient care due to less consistent patient monitoring and poorer adherence to standard adverse event prevention methods (such...