Skip to main content

Chronic Use of NSAIDs May Decrease Skin Cancer Risk


May 29, 2012 — Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may decrease the risk for developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or malignant melanoma (MM), according to a new population-based, case-control study published online May 29 in Cancer.
Use of NSAIDs overall (>2 prescriptions) was associated with a decreased risk for SCC (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 - 0.94) and MM (IRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80 - 0.95) compared with nonuse (≤2 prescriptions). This was especially true for long-term use (≥7 years) and high-intensity use (>25% prescription coverage during the total duration of use). Although NSAID use was not associated with a reduced risk for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) overall (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93 - 1.01), a reduced risk for BCC at sites other than the head was noted with long-term use (IRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 - 0.95) and high-intensity use (IRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69 - 0.91).
"The effect [of NSAIDs] increased with greater duration and intensity of use, which may reflect a cumulative biologic effect (ie, a dose-response effect) exerted in the initiation of carcinogenesis," write Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir, BSc, from the Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, and colleagues.
The researchers note that the NSAIDs associated with reduced risk were primarily nonselective NSAIDs and older cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (diclofenac, etodolac, and meloxicam). Unlike other studies, "[o]ur results do not support an association between newer COX-2 inhibitors and skin cancer or NSAIDs overall and BCC. However, our findings are in accordance with studies conducted in the general population. Thus, the effects of NSAIDs may depend on the baseline risk of skin cancer," the authors write.
Using the Danish Cancer Registry (DCR), the authors identified all cases of SCC, MM, and BCC diagnosed in individuals 20 years of age or older in northern Denmark from 1991 through 2009. The researchers identified 1974 diagnoses of SCC, 13,316 diagnoses of BCC, and 3242 diagnoses MM.
Information on the site of the cancer was collected, and patients with a history of disorders known to increase the risk for skin cancer (HIV, a previous cancer diagnosis, or history of solid organ transplantation) were excluded.
The investigators used the Danish Civil Registry System to match 10 population control individuals to each case patient based on age, sex, and country of residence. They also used the system to collect information regarding NSAID use. Patients with a history of rheumatoid arthritis, migraines, or cardiovascular disease were identified and these diseases used as proxy measures for chronic NSAID use.
The median age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 77 years, 67 years, and 57 years for SCC, BCC, and MM, respectively. Patients diagnosed with SCC were predominately men (63%), with tumors frequently located on the head and neck (56%). Men accounted for 50% of patients diagnosed with BCC and 45% of patients diagnosed with MM.
The authors acknowledge that analysis of newer COX-2 inhibitors was curtailed by the fact that they were only available during part of the study period and, in some instances, were withdrawn from the market. Results may also have been biased because only 60% of SCC and BCC cases are recorded in the DCR. In addition, the study relied on dispensed prescriptions, which may not accurately reflect actual drug use both among prescription and over-the-counter NSAID users. The authors note, however, that repeated refills for the same medications likely implies adherence to a prescribed treatment regime.
"Given the high skin cancer incidence and the widespread and frequent use of NSAIDs, a preventive effect of these agents may have important public health implications," the authors note.
"We observed that NSAIDs overall, including aspirin, other nonselective NSAIDs, and older COX-2 inhibitors, were associated with a decreased risk of skin cancer, particularly SCC and MM," they conclude.
Funding for this study was provided by the Clinical Epidemiological Research Foundation. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Missing Data Lead FDA Panel to Vote Against Rivaroxaban for ACS May 23, 2012 (Updated May 24, 2012) (Silver Spring, Maryland) — The missing data issues plaguing the ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 trial of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting, the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus clopidogrel, or ticlopidine. Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the ATLAS ACS TIMI 46 phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage, but the studies were hindered by early patient withdrawals and missing data. We Don't Know What We're Missing Based on the ATLAS ACS 2 results, FDA reviewer Dr Karen Hicks recommended approval of rivaroxaban for the requested indications except all-cause mortality. However, another FDA reviewer, Dr Thomas Marciniak, was adamant that the trial results are not interpretable because about 12% of the patients had incomplete follow-up, far higher than the 1% to 1.5% differences in the end-point rates between rivaroxaban and placebo. A total of 1294 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, and the company was only able to contact 183, of which 177 were confirmed to be alive. Because of the patient dropouts, the company adopted a "modified intention-to-treat analysis," whereby patients were observed for 30 days after randomization or the global end date for the trial, instead of observing all the patients until the end of the trial as the FDA originally suggested. Marciniak criticized the sponsor's efforts to follow the patients and said that three patient deaths not counted in the modified intention-to-treat analysis may just be the "tip of the iceberg." Because the percentage of patients whose ultimate vital status remains unknown is much greater than the reported differences in mortality rates, the claimed mortality benefits are not reliable. The majority of the panel sided with Marciniak. For example, Dr Sanjay Kaul (University of California, Los Angeles) voted "no" because "there was enough uncertainty in the quality and robustness of the data that dissuaded me from voting yes. . . . The 'missingness' of the data doesn't invalidate it, but it certainly makes it hard to infer [the conclusion]." Dr Steven Nissen (Cleveland Clinic, OH) said that the decision to use the modified intention-to-treat analysis had a "profound impact" on the interpretability of the data. "It's saying we don't care what happens after 30 days, [and] that colored the trial in ways we couldn't recover from." Given the risk of major bleeding, "I want to see better evidence that this strategy of adding an Xa inhibitor or a direct thrombin inhibitor or something else to a good antiplatelet agent is robustly better for the patient," Nissen said. He recommends that the companies run a new trial of the 2.5 twice-daily dose of rivaroxaban using a strict intention-to-treat approach, but, he said, "I don't expect the death benefit to be too robust." Several panelists said they were concerned that the patients who dropped out of the trial were disproportionately likely to have a bleeding event, which led them to quit the trial, or a "protopathic" event, as statistician Dr Scott Emerson (University of Washington, Seattle) put it. "We're worried that an impending event is what is changing their behavior. We see that all the time in clinical trials--that regularly measured end points do not pick up [all of] the events," he said. He said that since the company was only able to contact 183 of the over 1200 patients who dropped out, it is possible that the dropouts skew the outcomes comparison of the trial. "Differential event rates after dropout are the number-one thing we're afraid of, so you have to explore it" in a statistical sensitivity analysis of the potential impact of these unknown outcomes. "It would not surprise me if, at the end of the day, these data did not hold up under a proper sensitivity analysis," he said. "What I want to know is, among the people who had events, how differential was the follow-up, but I can tell you by just looking at it, there was a very slightly different amount of follow-up of the people in the treatment arm. But I don't know whether everyone in the treatment arm was cured and they were trekking in the Himalayas and everyone in the placebo arm went home to die. I don't know that that's not the case." Dr Maury Krantz (University of Colorado, Denver) voted in favor of approval but said he does not know how rivaroxaban would perform in general clinical practice, especially when used with aspirin and clopidogrel. "I felt very much torn by this. This isn't a simple paradigm shift. It means going to triple therapy, which is really a three-headed monster in many ways. I think that what you're going to see in practice, if this is not done carefully with the proper labeling and secondary studies, is really dramatic magnification of bleeding and perhaps minimization of the efficacy benefit."

May 23, 2012   (Updated May 24, 2012)  (Silver Spring, Maryland)  —  The missing data issues plaguing the  ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51   trial of the factor Xa inhibitor  rivaroxaban  (Xarelto, Bayer Healthcare/Janssen Pharmaceuticals) have prevented the drug from earning the endorsement of the  FDA  Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. At its May 23 meeting , the panel voted six to four (with one abstention) against recommending that the FDA approve rivaroxaban for reducing the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina in combination with aspirin, aspirin plus  clopidogrel , or  ticlopidine . Janssen's application is based on the results of the ATLAS ACS 2 phase 3 and the  ATLAS ACS TIMI 46   phase 2 trial. The placebo-controlled ATLAS ACS 2 showed rivaroxaban reduced the risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while increasing the ri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Antidepressants Linked to Higher Diabetes Risk in Kids

Pediatric patients who use antidepressants may have an elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, the authors of a new study report. In a retrospective cohort study of more than 119,000 youths 5 to 20 years of age, the risk for incident type 2 diabetes was nearly twice as high among current users of certain types of antidepressants as among former users, Mehmet Burcu, PhD, and colleagues report in an article  published online October 16 in  JAMA Pediatrics . The risk intensified with increasing duration of use, greater cumulative doses, and higher daily doses of these antidepressants. The findings point to a growing need for closer monitoring of these products, including greater balancing of risks and benefits, in the pediatric population, the authors caution. They undertook the study because, despite growing evidence of an association between antidepressant use and an increased risk for type 2 diabetes in adults, similar research in pediatric patients was scarce. "To our know...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sitting at Work Raises All-Cause and CV Mortality Risk

May 21, 2012 (Lyon, France) — Sitting at work raises the risk of dying from cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic diseases, as well as the risk of dying from all causes, regardless of any exercise in which the individual may engage. That was the finding of a study reported here at the 19th European Congress on Obesity (ECO) by Anne Grunseit, PhD, from the Prevention Research Collaboration in the School of Public Health at the University of Sydney, Australia, and Norwegian colleagues. Research is increasingly focusing on sedentary behavior with low energy expenditure, including sitting and lying down, as behavioral risk factors for obesity and chronic disease. Sitting occurs during travel, while watching television, using computers, and reading. But with people often spending at least 9 hours a day at work, with fewer than 20% of jobs requiring physical exertion, and with many people spending at least 4 hours a day sitting at work, the sedentary time at work is high, and many people ar...
Post a Comment
Read more